It looks like any previous crime can be forgotten as long as there’s regime change to be achieved
What reasonable person wouldn’t give terrorists the benefit of the doubt? Maybe banking on jihadists will work out this time, eh? If not, the West can always just bomb them into oblivion. That should work out about as well as it always does.
Where have we seen this movie before? Ah, yes. “Anti-Soviet warrior puts his army on the road to peace,” journalist Robert Fisk wrote in The Independent in 1993 – about Al-Qaeda founder and former CIA asset against the Soviets in Afghanistan, Osama Bin Laden. And we know how that turned out. Now Al-Qaeda’s leader in Syria is getting the same treatment from the Western establishment.
It seems like just yesterday Washington and vassals were slamming the same group of jihadists who recently rampaged through Syria and rocked right up to Damascus as former President Bashar Assad fled to Moscow.
We’re talking here about a coup d’état by a group – Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) – long considered terrorist by the West. And not even just by Washington, whose embassy in Syria tweeted in 2017 that “HTS is a merger and any group that merged into it becomes part of Al-Qaeda’s Syrian network.”
The European Union’s Agency for Asylum’s website also describes HTS as “frequently committing serious human rights abuses, including harassment, assassinations, kidnapping, and torture, as well as unlawful detention of civilians,” and having committed suicide bombings, hostage takings, extortion, and assassination. But hey, at least they’re not Assad, right?
It was clear that something was up recently when the Western press started promoting the hoax that this reputationally-botoxed version of Al-Qaeda is also woke, with its leader saying things in published videos like: “diversity is a strength.”
Also, why does it seem like he and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky share the same stylist? Maybe he figures that if he resembles the Western establishment’s girlfriend, they’ll fall in love with him. And maybe it worked, because they’re choosing him over Assad despite the fact that this same HTS leader, Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, is still listed as wanted by Washington to the tune of a $10 million bounty and is under a United Nations arms embargo since 2013 for palling around with ISIS. But he did brand his stampede through Aleppo, “Together We Return,” according to Britain’s Telegraph – which is apparently the new way of branding a coup d’état as social justice. He also has the Western media saying that his regime will be more lenient than the Taliban in Afghanistan. Woah, let’s not go too crazy now in aiming high!
Despite the United Nations’ condemnations of this guy, its special envoy for Syria apparently didn’t get the memo, calling the HTS coup a “watershed moment” from which the UN looks forward with hope for “peace, reconciliation, dignity, and inclusion.” Why stop there? Has he even assured the UN yet that his executions are going to be climate-neutral?
Britain’s deputy prime minister welcomed the change from Assad. You’d think that he hadn’t dropped off the radar. This is like when the West – led mainly by the UK and France – cheered the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi by local proxies in Libya, setting the country on the path to becoming a failed state. Not to mention sparking a tidal wave of migrants into Europe fleeing the ensuing chaos, which Gaddafi had explicitly warned would happen.
Meanwhile, the former head of MI6, Sir John Sawers, told Sky News that it would be “rather ridiculous” if Britain couldn’t deal with these terrorists just because they’re on Washington’s outcast catalog. Chomping at the bit to do business with the guy who was palling around with ISIS now that the West has spontaneously rehabilitated his image – it’s almost like British intelligence hasn’t clued in to the fact that US sanctions serve to give Washington first dibs on deals with any terrorists magically converted into freedom fighters after doing the West’s dirty work. Just ask the French business community how they feel about being shut out of US-sanctioned Iran while Washington was granting exemptions to their own corporations doing business with Tehran.
Right in black and white on the EU’s website, it says that the objective of HTS is to “establish Islamic rule” in Syria by overthrowing Assad. Now they’re ecstatic about the exact thing that they were warning about.
Here in France, we’re a long way from the days, nearly a quarter-century ago, when former President Jacques Chirac was warning that overthrowing Saddam Hussein in Iraq wouldn’t be the means to a glorious end that Washington fantasized about. These days, Macron, who you’d think might want to keep a low profile on the subject of presidential legitimacy given that a new CSA poll finds 59% of French want him to resign, has effectively underscored that he shares the same brain cell as his Western counterparts on Assad’s leadership. “The barbaric state has fallen. At last,” he said. “I pay tribute to the Syrian people, to their courage, to their patience.” Looks like the “barbaric state” might just be limbering up rather than falling, given who’s now in charge.
The West is great at ripping down regime change highway, cheering all the way – but not so great at finding exit ramps that don’t go straight off a cliff. Speaking of which, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said that Assad “oppressed his people brutally” and “has countless lives on his conscience and has driven numerous people to flee, many of whom have arrived in Germany.” You think it couldn’t possibly get worse in the fleeing-to-Germany department, huh? You’ve just blessed Al-Qaeda with an entire country. What could possibly go wrong?
Riding shotgun and handling the GPS in Scholz’s moron-mobile is his foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, whose navigational skills are so notorious that she infamously took a U-turn to be 360 degrees. Joining the anti-Assad pile-on, she added that “the country must not fall into the hands of other radicals – no matter what guise they take.”
A bit late for that when the guys taking over Syria are the ideological successors of the group – Al-Qaeda – that her Western pals hold responsible for nosediving into the Pentagon and New York’s twin towers on September 11, 2001. That’s what you’re cheering here, genius.
Surely the EU’s new foreign minister, Kaja Kallas, would be aware of small matters like the bloc’s own website describing these terrorists as having forced religious minorities to convert to Islam though, right?
“The end of Assad’s dictatorship is a positive and long-awaited development. It also shows the weakness of Assad’s backers, Russia, and Iran,” Kallas said.
Well, looks like she’s too busy obsessing over Russia and Iran to even bother caring who these guys are – beyond the fact that they’re not Assad. The same Assad who had managed to be ignored by them almost completely for years ever since their previous CIA and Pentagon-backed ‘Syrian rebel’ regime change operation failed. But now he’s suddenly worse than jihadists. Of course he has to be. Because otherwise how could they possibly justify condoning a successor of America’s former number one enemy to shake loose a whole country for the taking?
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
