https://sputnikglobe.com/20241230/tiny-size-large-benefits-how-small-satellites-can-help-humans-in-space-1121310355.html
Tiny Size, Large Benefits: How Small Satellites Can Help Humans in Space
Tiny Size, Large Benefits: How Small Satellites Can Help Humans in Space
Sputnik International
Small satellites and spacecraft have come a long way since the 1990s when it became apparent that such relatively tiny craft could be launched into space piggy-back i.e. along the main payload, explains Prof. Mikhail Ovchinnikov, a standing member of the International Academy of Astronautics.
2024-12-30T18:46+0000
2024-12-30T18:46+0000
2024-12-30T18:46+0000
beyond politics
science & tech
space
new satellites
spacecraft
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e5/07/0e/1083386651_0:0:3500:1969_1920x0_80_0_0_1bc3c5eba827752253f2447f5178da4e.jpg
The emergence of CubeSat – small cubic satellites weighing about 1kg that even students could assemble as part of their projects – and group spaceflights each became important milestones in the development of small spacecraft, Ovchinnikov told Scientific Russia magazine.According to him, small spacecraft/satellites could be divided into three broad categories.First: constellations, a group of satellites that performs one goal but with each of these craft being controlled individually.Second: formation flying, satellites that too jointly perform the same task while operating relatively close to one another at distances ranging from 10 meters to 100 kilometers.Third: swarm, which lacks centralized guidance and “each craft’s flight depends on what that craft ‘knows’ about its neighbors,” as Ovchinnikov put it.There is no clear answer to the question which method is more effective, a single large spacecraft or a satellite swarm, Prof. Ovchinnicov remarked.If one needs to perform a task like detailed imaging of the Earth’s surface, which requires a large optic system, an expensive and heavy spacecraft would be the obvious choice, he explained.On the other hand, deploying a satellite swarm means that a malfunction of any of the satellites comprising it would entail relatively small financial losses and replacing it would be a relatively inexpensive endeavor.Furthermore, such defunct small satellites could be replaced with newer upgraded models, thus ensuring that the swarm would keep renewing and performing its goal more efficiently, he added.Small cost is one of the chief advantages of small satellites, Ovchinnikov stressed, pointing out that the 12U CubeSat mission to the Moon in 2023 only cost $30 million.He also mentioned that researchers from the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, where he heads the Space System Dynamic department, recently proposed launching a mission to Mars “on a small spacecraft weighing only 92kg.”Having noted that small spacecraft are already been actively used to study asteroids, Ovchinnikov suggested that in the coming years these tiny contraptions may find a more broad application in interplanetary missions.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20241225/launch-of-soyuz-rocket-with-resurs-p-satellite-1121264355.html
2024
News
en_EN
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e5/07/0e/1083386651_438:0:3063:1969_1920x0_80_0_0_daa8dff16df3d15d4cd2f3d534dafa27.jpg
small satellites, small spacecraft, interplanetary missions
small satellites, small spacecraft, interplanetary missions
Small satellites and spacecraft have come a long way since the 1990s when it became apparent that such relatively tiny craft could be launched into space piggy-back i.e. along the main payload, explains Prof. Mikhail Ovchinnikov, a standing member of the International Academy of Astronautics.
The emergence of CubeSat – small cubic satellites weighing about 1kg that even students could assemble as part of their projects – and group spaceflights each became important milestones in the development of small spacecraft, Ovchinnikov told Scientific Russia magazine.
According to him, small spacecraft/satellites could be divided into three broad categories.
First: constellations, a group of satellites that performs one goal but with each of these craft being controlled individually.
Second: formation flying, satellites that too jointly perform the same task while operating relatively close to one another at distances ranging from 10 meters to 100 kilometers.
Third: swarm, which lacks centralized guidance and “each craft’s flight depends on what that craft ‘knows’ about its neighbors,” as Ovchinnikov put it.
There is no clear answer to the question which method is more effective, a single large spacecraft or a satellite swarm, Prof. Ovchinnicov remarked.
If one needs to perform a task like detailed imaging of the Earth’s surface, which requires a large optic system, an expensive and heavy spacecraft would be the obvious choice, he explained.
On the other hand, deploying a satellite swarm means that a malfunction of any of the satellites comprising it would entail relatively small financial losses and replacing it would be a relatively inexpensive endeavor.
Furthermore, such defunct small satellites could be replaced with newer upgraded models, thus ensuring that the swarm would keep renewing and performing its goal more efficiently, he added.
Small cost is one of the chief advantages of small satellites, Ovchinnikov stressed, pointing out that the 12U CubeSat mission to the Moon in 2023 only cost $30 million.
He also mentioned that researchers from the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, where he heads the Space System Dynamic department, recently proposed launching a mission to Mars “on a small spacecraft weighing only 92kg.”
Having noted that small spacecraft are already been actively used to study asteroids, Ovchinnikov suggested that in the coming years these tiny contraptions may find a more broad application in interplanetary missions.
